Albanian vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Albanian
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Albanians
Chinese
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,873,103 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 31.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Albanian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 19.1% |
| Range | 11.1% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |