Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Chinese
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,220,481 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 18.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.6% | 19.1% |
| Range | 14.0% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |