Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,301,294 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 46.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 19.1% |
| Range | 36.8% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 6.8% |
| Median | 9.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (9.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
| German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |