Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%, a difference of 9.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Minimum | 31.9% | 47.5% |
Maximum | 86.2% | 82.6% |
Range | 54.2% | 35.1% |
Mean | 61.9% | 68.6% |
Median | 65.2% | 69.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.5% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |