Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
70.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,194,116 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 11.7% | 20.0% |
| Range | 9.8% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |