Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Bhutanese
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,543,414 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 35.1% | 41.4% |
| Range | 31.2% | 40.1% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 15.9% |
| Median | 16.1% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |