Immigrants from Denmark vs Swedish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Swedish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Swedes
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Swedish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,190,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.33%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Swedish |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 7.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.7% | 92.1% |
| Mean | 30.0% | 35.5% |
| Median | 22.5% | 26.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.7% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 43.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 23.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Swedes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |