Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,267,691 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 14.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 18.4% | 33.3% |
| Range | 15.1% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 12.7% |
| Median | 9.1% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (9.4%, a difference of 0.20%), German Russian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (9.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Portugal (9.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Spaniards | 22.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
| German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |