Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Chickasaw
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,238,893 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 48.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.89% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 33.3% |
Range | 14.2% | 29.7% |
Mean | 6.3% | 12.7% |
Median | 5.9% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |