Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Chickasaw
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 27.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 24.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 22.9% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 12.7% |
| Median | 7.1% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |