Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Chickasaw
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 41.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.73% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 33.3% |
Range | 18.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 7.4% | 12.7% |
Median | 6.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |