Immigrants from Oceania vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Pima
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,361,436 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 85.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Pima |
Minimum | 2.1% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 53.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.7% | 89.3% |
Mean | 19.1% | 38.9% |
Median | 16.3% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Costa Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |