Apache vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Apache
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Apache
Pima
24.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,742,001 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 24.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 21.4%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Pima |
Minimum | 15.9% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 84.1% | 89.3% |
Mean | 45.2% | 38.9% |
Median | 46.3% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.3% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.8% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.6% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.6% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Black/African American (24.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (24.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Yup'ik (24.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Dominican (24.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Colville (24.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 24.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |