Australian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Australian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Australians
Pima
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,429,706 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 103.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Pima |
Minimum | 1.7% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.6% | 89.3% |
Mean | 21.1% | 38.9% |
Median | 15.8% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.3% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Turkey (14.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Poland (14.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Croatia (14.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Slovenes | 98.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Europeans | 98.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Australians | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |