Bulgarian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Pima
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,586,421 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 124.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Pima |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 30.7% | 89.3% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 38.9% |
| Median | 10.9% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 51.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 29.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |