Immigrants from Romania vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Pima
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,981,907 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 104.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Pima |
Minimum | 1.6% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.4% | 89.3% |
Mean | 20.3% | 38.9% |
Median | 13.6% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.9% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Soviet Union (14.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (14.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cambodian (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Slovene (14.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Slovenes | 98.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Europeans | 98.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |