Indonesian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Indonesian
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Indonesians
Creek
21.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,734,179 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Creek |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 48.1% | 77.8% |
| Range | 44.8% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 31.3% |
| Median | 22.3% | 28.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |