Spanish vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spanish
Creek
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,340,286 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 28.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Creek |
Minimum | 2.9% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 97.1% | 72.7% |
Mean | 34.8% | 31.3% |
Median | 24.1% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.9% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |