Spanish American vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish American
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spanish Americans
Creek
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,807,072 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 9.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Creek |
Minimum | 0.37% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 99.6% | 72.7% |
Mean | 27.9% | 31.3% |
Median | 21.3% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |