Immigrants from China vs Burmese Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Burmese
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Burmese
20.3%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Burmese Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,755,580 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,915,449 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Burmese |
Minimum | 4.7% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 66.7% |
Range | 25.3% | 64.5% |
Mean | 17.3% | 20.0% |
Median | 18.2% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 21.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Burmese by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (20.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ireland (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Korea (20.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Singapore (20.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and Thai (20.1%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Eastern European (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Okinawan (20.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Lithuania (20.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Paraguayan (20.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 20.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 20.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 20.5% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 20.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 20.5% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 20.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 20.6% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 20.6% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 20.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 20.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 20.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 21.0% |
Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 21.0% |