Immigrants from China vs Burmese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Burmese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Burmese
10.1%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Burmese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,054,974 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,330,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%.

Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Burmese |
Minimum | 3.1% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 37.1% |
Range | 16.6% | 36.1% |
Mean | 9.4% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.1% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Burmese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Iranian (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (10.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Pakistan (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (10.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Asian (10.4%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Immigrants from Iran (10.3%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.5% |