German vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
German
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Germans
Ute
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,937,968 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 46.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | German | Ute |
Minimum | 4.2% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.8% | 90.4% |
Mean | 18.0% | 33.1% |
Median | 13.3% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Germans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Switzerland (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (14.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Basque (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |