Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Tsimshian
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,737,995 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.71%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 22.7% |
Range | 98.8% | 18.9% |
Mean | 13.1% | 9.9% |
Median | 8.0% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |