Osage vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Tsimshian
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 24.4% | 22.7% |
| Range | 23.6% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 9.9% |
| Median | 9.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |