Ethiopian vs Syrian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Syrian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Syrians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Syrian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,159,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Syrian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 30.1% | 45.6% |
| Range | 28.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 11.0% |
| Median | 12.2% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Syrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |