Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Belarus
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Belarus
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,166,810 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.24%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 24.0% |
| Range | 97.0% | 22.9% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 8.1% |
| Median | 10.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Belarus by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |