Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Belarus
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Belarus
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.94%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 24.0% |
| Range | 43.2% | 22.9% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 8.1% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Belarus by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |