Immigrants from Italy vs Swiss Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Swiss
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Swiss
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Swiss Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,580,979 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 12.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Swiss |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 12.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 87.5% |
| Mean | 28.7% | 33.2% |
| Median | 15.6% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.1% | 25.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 25.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |