Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Swiss Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Swiss
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Swiss
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Swiss Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,330,182 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 0.23%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Swiss |
Minimum | 4.9% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 34.8% | 87.5% |
Mean | 23.3% | 33.2% |
Median | 22.0% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Swiss by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |