Chippewa vs Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chippewa
Bangladeshi
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chippewa
Bangladeshis
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,467,619 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 3.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 7.5% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.5% |
Range | 92.5% | 53.8% |
Mean | 37.7% | 22.6% |
Median | 27.8% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.3% | 29.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.5% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Bangladeshis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Haitian (20.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and Blackfeet (20.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |