Arapaho vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Arapaho
Canadian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Arapaho
Canadians
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,689,796 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,709,261 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 39.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Canadian |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.0% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 31.1% | 33.6% |
| Median | 27.3% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.8% | 48.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 33.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 27.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 27.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Arapaho by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |