Chippewa vs Nonimmigrants Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chippewa
Nonimmigrants
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chippewa
Nonimmigrants
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Nonimmigrants Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,419,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 12.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Nonimmigrants |
Minimum | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.2% |
Range | 92.5% | 31.6% |
Mean | 37.7% | 17.9% |
Median | 27.8% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.3% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |