Ethiopian vs Uruguayan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Uruguayan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ethiopians
Uruguayans
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Uruguayan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,230,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,695,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 45.6% | 56.8% |
Range | 43.5% | 53.8% |
Mean | 16.3% | 22.0% |
Median | 15.5% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 19.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Uruguayans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Hungarian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |