Chickasaw vs Uruguayan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Uruguayan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Uruguayans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Uruguayan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 57.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 51.4% | 42.9% |
| Range | 49.5% | 39.1% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 14.9% |
| Median | 21.4% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |