Chickasaw vs Icelander Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Icelander
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Chickasaw
Icelanders
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Icelander Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,647,895 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Icelander |
| Minimum | 27.5% | 28.3% |
| Maximum | 68.4% | 93.2% |
| Range | 40.9% | 64.9% |
| Mean | 48.9% | 57.1% |
| Median | 49.7% | 56.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 50.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 60.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 14.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Iraq (47.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (47.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (47.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Australia (47.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
| New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 78.2 /100 | #136 | Good 47.2% |
| Paraguayans | 77.8 /100 | #137 | Good 47.2% |
| Pakistanis | 77.5 /100 | #138 | Good 47.2% |