Chickasaw vs Icelander No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Icelander
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Icelanders
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Icelander No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,468,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 22.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Icelander |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 15.9% | 17.9% |
| Range | 14.6% | 17.4% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 4.9% |
| Median | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Korea (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |