Cherokee vs Ottawa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Ottawa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Ottawa
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Ottawa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,943,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 61.8% | 31.7% |
| Range | 59.5% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 15.0% |
| Median | 19.3% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Ottawa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |