Cherokee vs West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
West Indians
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,168 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 3.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | West Indian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 7.8% |
| Maximum | 61.8% | 35.3% |
| Range | 59.5% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 15.7% |
| Median | 19.3% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |