Sudanese vs Ottawa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Ottawa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Ottawa
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Ottawa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,943,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 31.7% |
| Range | 41.4% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 15.0% |
| Median | 14.4% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Ottawa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |