Cherokee vs Guyanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Guyanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Guyanese
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Guyanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,777,611 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Guyanese |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 61.8% | 27.5% |
| Range | 59.5% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 14.0% |
| Median | 19.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Guyanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |