Costa Rican vs Afghan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Afghan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Afghans
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Afghan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,780,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.93%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Afghan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 26.4% |
| Range | 29.8% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| Median | 9.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Afghans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |