Arapaho vs Liberian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Arapaho
Liberian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Arapaho
Liberians
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Liberian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,689,796 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,670,688 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 9.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Liberian |
Minimum | 7.0% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.0% | 99.7% |
Mean | 31.1% | 21.9% |
Median | 27.3% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.8% | 24.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 16.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Arapaho by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |