Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Chickasaw
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Chickasaw
25.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
52.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,180,319 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 5.6%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 71.7% | 60.4% |
Range | 68.9% | 57.6% |
Mean | 30.5% | 29.3% |
Median | 28.7% | 28.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.9% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 36.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Chile (25.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (25.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Greece (25.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Oceania (25.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Sri Lankan (25.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 63.8 /100 | #166 | Good 25.5% |
Paiute | 62.9 /100 | #167 | Good 25.5% |
Seminole | 62.6 /100 | #168 | Good 25.6% |
Peruvians | 60.1 /100 | #169 | Good 25.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 57.5 /100 | #170 | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 25.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 53.2 /100 | #172 | Average 25.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 52.9 /100 | #173 | Average 25.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 25.8% |
Sri Lankans | 47.0 /100 | #175 | Average 25.8% |
Paraguayans | 46.7 /100 | #176 | Average 25.8% |
Cambodians | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 25.8% |
Chinese | 42.0 /100 | #178 | Average 25.9% |
Samoans | 38.6 /100 | #179 | Fair 26.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 38.0 /100 | #180 | Fair 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |