Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Chickasaw
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Chickasaw
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,671,089 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 0.090%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 14.2% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 60.4% |
| Range | 19.1% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 24.8% | 29.3% |
| Median | 25.2% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 36.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Europe (27.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Europe (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Ukrainians | 2.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Portuguese | 2.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Israelis | 2.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Immigrants | France | 2.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 27.4% |