Bhutanese vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chickasaw
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Bhutanese
Chickasaw
27.0%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,138,655 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 0.67%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 48.8% | 60.4% |
| Range | 44.9% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 26.8% | 29.3% |
| Median | 27.2% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.0% | 36.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Argentinean (27.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ottawa (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (27.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Spaniard (27.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Spaniards | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 5.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 5.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Ottawa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Bhutanese | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Argentineans | 5.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |