Jordanian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,713,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 48.6%, a difference of 0.35%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Jordanian	Immigrants from Lithuania
Minimum	23.6%	40.7%
Maximum	83.7%	80.4%
Range	60.1%	39.7%
Mean	51.6%	53.3%
Median	50.9%	51.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	46.2%	47.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	58.8%	56.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.6%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.9%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.7%	7.9%

Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Lithuania by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are White/Caucasian (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (48.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Eastern European (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Samoans	99.4 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 48.7%
Eastern Europeans	99.3 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 48.6%
Irish	99.3 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 48.6%
Whites/Caucasians	99.3 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.3 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 48.6%
Austrians	99.3 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.3 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 48.6%
Poles	99.2 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 48.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.2 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 48.5%
Czechoslovakians	99.2 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 48.5%
Croatians	99.1 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 48.5%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 48.5%
Luxembourgers	99.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 48.5%
Basques	99.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 48.4%
Northern Europeans	99.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 48.4%
Jordanians	98.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 48.4%
Romanians	98.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| China	98.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| North America	98.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 48.4%