Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chickasaw Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chickasaw
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chickasaw
7.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chickasaw Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,615,585 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 4.2%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 23.7% |
| Range | 13.7% | 22.8% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Chickasaw by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cajun (7.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Alaskan Athabascan (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Malaysian (7.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Africa (7.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Bermudan (7.3%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Ute (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Panamanian (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (7.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Bermudans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 7.3% |