Central American Indian vs Burmese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Burmese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Central American Indians
Burmese
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
49.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Burmese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,060,937 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 43.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,866,079 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 49.8%, a difference of 13.8%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Burmese |
Minimum | 20.1% | 22.5% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 65.9% | 77.5% |
Mean | 45.4% | 57.1% |
Median | 44.1% | 55.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.0% | 48.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.2% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 14.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Korean (49.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Swedish (49.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (49.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |