Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Bahamas Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from Bahamas
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from Bahamas
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Bahamas Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,629,900 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 0.46% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 16.6% |
| Range | 18.9% | 16.1% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Scottish (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |