Mexican American Indian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Zimbabweans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 16.4%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.46% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 17.3% |
Range | 18.9% | 16.5% |
Mean | 7.6% | 5.5% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |